Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:52:50
Server time: 19:07:09, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (10): ahodri | albaniansunited | ameerali | friedrich3 | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | lulus | reformist2024 | Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Policy Reform for Improved Function

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Syndicalist Coalition

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2438

Description[?]:

Article I
"Equality and fairness go hand in hand."
-Anonymous

When a neighboring or rival nation imposes tariffs on our exports, why would we not do the same in kind? The current law merely allows for other states to gain a great of money from our inability to match their taxes on imports. As it stands, the current inequality will only discourage our own industries from exporting goods when they have to pay an increased price to import raw materials.

Article II
This equality does not apply, however, to our open allowance of immigrants into our nation. People, while sharing equal unalienable rights, are in life unequal by the result of their education, occupation, and wealth. Why should we allow immigrants with nothing to offer our nation, and possibly have criminal histories, into our country with such ease? Instead, we should allow only those that we can trust to live a good and a productive life into our nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:50:44, August 01, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Reform for Improved Function
MessageWe are willing to support this, but only if qualifications are not too harsh.

Date07:41:13, August 02, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Liberal Democrat Party
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Reform for Improved Function
Message"We may be able to support this."

-George Howard
Foreign Affairs Minister

Date01:41:48, August 03, 2007 CET
FromNational Syndicalist Coalition
ToDebating the Foreign Policy Reform for Improved Function
MessageQualifications would merely include a check into the background of incoming individuals who wish to permanently reside in our nation. Should they have a criminal record, or somehow be perceived as a future burden to the state, the government reserves the right to prevent them from remaining here indefinitely.

In light of the show of support from the National Coalition and the Liberal Democratic Party, we move to bring this bill to a vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 210

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 71


    Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

    Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59