We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecology Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2438
Description[?]:
| Letting ecology restrictions up to the local governments instead of no restrictions |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: The government enforces no regulations.
Current: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Proposed: The government maintains a list of endangered and threatened species, which it encourages hunters not to shoot.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Current: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Proposed: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Current: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Proposed: The government encourages, but does not require new and replacement plantation.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government does not regulate the quality of drinking water.
Current: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Proposed: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:27:42, August 01, 2007 CET | From |  Liberty Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | I can remove some bills but I think these are pretty acceptable |
| Date | 21:39:44, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Green Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | if my proposed enviornmental and wildlife protection acts fail, then this is better than the status quo |
| Date | 22:15:53, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | Ok ill leave this up there until we vote on yours |
| Date | 00:21:41, August 02, 2007 CET | From | New Liberal Action | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | Youve got our support |
| Date | 09:47:48, August 02, 2007 CET | From | Trunder Party | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | Survival is the most important feature of the evolution of animals everywhere. If they cannot adapt to our hunters, then nature has failed at it's own game(pun not intended). Surely there are more important issues to spend our nations resources on! |
| Date | 10:15:49, August 02, 2007 CET | From | Union for Social Justice | To | Debating the Ecology Act |
| Message | We oppose. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 257 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 157 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 11 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Ninety percent of the politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation." - Henry Kissinger |