We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Electoral Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2438
Description[?]:
An act to equalise the provinces of Kafuristan in elections. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:48:43, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Electoral Reform Act |
Message | It's silly we can't choose for an entirely proprtional system, but the one I have chosen is the closest to pure proportionality out of the three choices available. At the last election, Hiamou, with 25.11% of the population had only 20% of the vote, while Keletia, which had 16.57% of the population also had 20% of the vote. Each citizen's vote in Hiamou had less of an effect than a Keletian's citizen which is incompatible with democracy. Therefore I propose using a fairer system. |
Date | 23:16:00, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Electoral Reform Act |
Message | Why vote no KSP? |
Date | 23:19:30, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the Electoral Reform Act |
Message | Because the KSP usually does best in Keletia and Kuchifey. |
Date | 23:42:00, August 01, 2007 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Electoral Reform Act |
Message | Oh botheration, I left out the proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 466 | |||||||
no | Total Seats: 39 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |