Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 03:56:03
Server time: 04:03:56, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | saintstiiizy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Senate Resolution 9: Civil Liberties Advancement-Progression Act (CLAP Act)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Independent Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2438

Description[?]:

To advance the current Progressive state of Solentia and to increase upon citizen's existing civil liberties.

Federal Independent Leaders will openly work with any party that wishes to discuss or question about a particular Article within the Senate Resolution.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:02:22, August 02, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 9: Civil Liberties Advancement-Progression Act (CLAP Act)
MessageWe support Article 4 only. Although the LPS is pro-civil liberties, laws that are too soft, and too lax will be to the detriment of our nation. Laws need to protect society as a whole from harm, we can see no positive benefits for this change.

Xavier Evans, Party Leader

Date20:53:16, August 02, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 9: Civil Liberties Advancement-Progression Act (CLAP Act)
MessageAbsolutely not to Articles 1-3. Need I remind the FIP leadership that it was drugs and alcohol that robbed Solentia of Kevin Sunderland and James Du Chanc, who were friends of the FIP? You will find NO CPS support on this matter.

Julia Taylor, Inner Party Leader

Date20:28:01, August 03, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Party of the Proletariat
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 9: Civil Liberties Advancement-Progression Act (CLAP Act)
MessageThe SSDP cannot support the breadth of these measures. We can agree on Article 4, but the other Articles are needless and present potential detriments to society.

Finn Jacob, SSDP Chairman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 67

no
    

Total Seats: 108

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

    Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 69