We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
Details
Submitted by[?]: Green Democratic Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2440
Description[?]:
To keep a peaceful stance with our allies and neutral friends, we propose this bill to cut back on our exporting of weaponry to only our closest of allies and to stop any production of nuclear weaponry but still research the technology for these dangerous things. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government allows all arms to be exported freely.
Current: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Proposed: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:57:25, August 05, 2007 CET | From | Scientific Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | Well, we sort of approve of the first two, but we don't approve of the third one. |
Date | 11:43:57, August 05, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian people's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | Article 1 is the only one i approve. |
Date | 13:56:24, August 05, 2007 CET | From | Union of Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | We are in agreement with the JPP - article 1 is the only one we approve of. |
Date | 21:26:53, August 05, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | Article 3 I dont see how anybody can oppose. Selling arms to anybody but allies can end badly, as the situation in the real world says. The terroists in teh middle east have weapons sold by us to them. Also, if Jakania is neutral, why do we need chemical/biological/nuclear weapons? To me, it seems like nothing but a total and utter waste of money. |
Date | 22:24:30, August 05, 2007 CET | From | Union of Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | A. You could argue that if they're going to get weapons from anyone, it might as well be us as someone else making a profit from them. B. It's a deterrent, so other countries won't bother invading. |
Date | 18:19:49, August 06, 2007 CET | From | Green Democratic Union | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction |
Message | We have updated this bill and now it will be moving into voting stages. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 226 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 24 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |