Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 02:50:06
Server time: 05:09:53, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Democratic Union

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2440

Description[?]:

To keep a peaceful stance with our allies and neutral friends, we propose this bill to cut back on our exporting of weaponry to only our closest of allies and to stop any production of nuclear weaponry but still research the technology for these dangerous things.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:57:25, August 05, 2007 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageWell, we sort of approve of the first two, but we don't approve of the third one.

Date11:43:57, August 05, 2007 CET
From Jakanian people's Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageArticle 1 is the only one i approve.

Date13:56:24, August 05, 2007 CET
From Union of Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageWe are in agreement with the JPP - article 1 is the only one we approve of.

Date21:26:53, August 05, 2007 CET
From United Democrats of Jakania
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageArticle 3 I dont see how anybody can oppose. Selling arms to anybody but allies can end badly, as the situation in the real world says. The terroists in teh middle east have weapons sold by us to them.

Also, if Jakania is neutral, why do we need chemical/biological/nuclear weapons? To me, it seems like nothing but a total and utter waste of money.

Date22:24:30, August 05, 2007 CET
From Union of Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageA. You could argue that if they're going to get weapons from anyone, it might as well be us as someone else making a profit from them.

B. It's a deterrent, so other countries won't bother invading.

Date18:19:49, August 06, 2007 CET
From Green Democratic Union
ToDebating the Nuclear Weapon/Exporting Weaponry Reduction
MessageWe have updated this bill and now it will be moving into voting stages.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 226

no
   

Total Seats: 24

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

    Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77