Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:38:36
Server time: 20:21:23, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Brazil25 | Interstellar. | Liu Che | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Malivia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2441

Description[?]:

This bill will help to maximize the effectiveness of hearing the people by raising the maximum number of seats, and also by lowering the term length.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:13:24, August 07, 2007 CET
FromPeoples Movement for an Obedient Society
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageThe PMOS would certainly agree in a reduction of term length at this juncture.

With the inclusion of more parties increasing the seat numbers may also be prudent.

Date19:18:54, August 07, 2007 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageThe MNP sees no reason to change the current Parliament arrangements.

Date02:31:48, August 08, 2007 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageWe would support expanding the Parliament. We would rather not shorten term lengths at the moment, though. Since they were originally shortened to 4 years we have seen all active parties play a considerable role, so we feel the system seems to work.

About a decade ago terms were 6 years long and the Parliament (then called the Jawa...) had only 200 seats. The situation has become considerably better since then.

Date05:35:16, August 08, 2007 CET
FromUnited Malivia
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageSo it would be reasonable to keep the larger amount of seats but drop the shortening of term? The ULSF would be pleased with that.

Date23:54:32, August 08, 2007 CET
FromPeoples Movement for an Obedient Society
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageThe seat increase, we feel, would be the main reason to back this Bill.

The term length is not unreasonable : )

Date01:37:54, August 09, 2007 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the ULSF - Parliament Reform of 2440
MessageThe term length was our main concern, but since that has been eliminated we will support this bill. The MNP feels that more seats will only to better represent the people.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 392

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

    Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59