Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:31:15
Server time: 15:28:44, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | Brazil25 | HopesFor | R Drax | SocDemDundorfian | Triguns7491 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Quellist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2441

Description[?]:

We propose this act to further civilise our nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:18:19, August 07, 2007 CET
From Vox Popularis Imperator
ToDebating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act
MessageOkay?

Date03:49:27, August 08, 2007 CET
From Deus Ex Machina Party
ToDebating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act
MessageWe abstain from this vote on the grounds that it is irrevelant to our voters, who are not concerned or offended by the flesh.

Date12:49:53, August 08, 2007 CET
From Quellist Party
ToDebating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act
Messageyou should never abstain, it hurts your electoral performance.

Date16:42:13, August 08, 2007 CET
From Deus Ex Machina Party
ToDebating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act
MessageThen we vote no to prevent law enforcement resources from being wasted on trivial matters.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 259

no
     

Total Seats: 491

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55