We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Quellist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2441
Description[?]:
We propose this act to further civilise our nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:18:19, August 07, 2007 CET | From | Vox Popularis Imperator | To | Debating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act |
Message | Okay? |
Date | 03:49:27, August 08, 2007 CET | From | Deus Ex Machina Party | To | Debating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act |
Message | We abstain from this vote on the grounds that it is irrevelant to our voters, who are not concerned or offended by the flesh. |
Date | 12:49:53, August 08, 2007 CET | From | Quellist Party | To | Debating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act |
Message | you should never abstain, it hurts your electoral performance. |
Date | 16:42:13, August 08, 2007 CET | From | Deus Ex Machina Party | To | Debating the Furtherance of Limitation of Public Nudity Act |
Message | Then we vote no to prevent law enforcement resources from being wasted on trivial matters. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 259 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 491 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum |