We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Payment for Services
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2097
Description[?]:
| In order that the government does not discriminate religion, we would allow ministers of religion to recieve pay. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Current: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:22:25, August 13, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | I suppose thats fine. |
| Date | 05:53:04, August 13, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Marxist Party | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | Under current legislation, can they accept donations from the community? I don't support wages at least not if the church wants to be treated as a non-profit organization. |
| Date | 01:42:48, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | true......but we do not interfere, on where the money goes. For all we know, the church will spend the money on...eh...after school activities...and whatnot. no actual way of telling. |
| Date | 11:04:56, August 15, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | We support this as we do not feel that the state should interevene in any matter of religion. If a religion wishes to pay their ministers then that is fine but that is up to them |
| Date | 23:48:12, August 17, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | PMP: Currently they cannot recieve a wage, but most non-profit organizations have some paid staff. |
| Date | 01:53:26, August 18, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Marxist Party | To | Debating the Payment for Services |
| Message | I'll support this even though I ask that their assets are watched closely.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 166 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 89 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Law is mind without reason." - Aristotle |