We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Save a tree, Eat a beaver
Details
Submitted by[?]: Chattes en Chaleur
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2441
Description[?]:
Words |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation maintains no intelligence agency.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:24:04, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Christians for a New World | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | i am only for 4! |
Date | 01:32:28, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Aristocracy United | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | Clearly article 4 needs doing! |
Date | 01:44:29, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | Remove Articles 1 and 2 and the SCP shall vote for this. |
Date | 01:45:25, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | Errr, my bad. I swear the articles just changed places. Anyways, I meant articles 1 and 4. |
Date | 02:30:06, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Superhuman Creation Party | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | I'm all for Article 4 but that's it. |
Date | 04:27:18, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | Everytime I look the articles are in different orders. Which article are most of you supporting? |
Date | 05:16:13, August 09, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | The DSP only approves of 1 & 4. |
Date | 07:30:33, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | The SCP opposes the articles centralizing waste management and the forestry agencies. We assume our colleagues in the DSP oppose the same articles. |
Date | 09:29:00, August 09, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | The DSP believes in federally protected forest lands and laws in regards to what can't be cut down, but we do think it should be up to the local government to decide on regulations for the rest. We believe that there should be some federal guidelines on waste management, like not being able to dump anywhere, but it should be up to the local government to decide which way(s) to use. In other words we believe in the Federal system where the local and Federal governments are mostly equal, but with some Federal powers that override local government. |
Date | 12:26:45, August 09, 2007 CET | From | Superhuman Creation Party | To | Debating the Save a tree, Eat a beaver |
Message | Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency. Old value:: The nation maintains no intelligence agency Current: The nation maintains no intelligence agency Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries This is what I support. They keep flip-flopping around. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 125 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine |