Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 00:43:11
Server time: 07:16:48, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sectual Congress

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2442

Description[?]:

Proposing a new new cabinet. Every party with seats still has a place on it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:36:45, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSectual Congress
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageSorry about all these new cabinet proposals, but we decided that we should control the Foreign Affairs position so that the administration will speak with one voice.

Date02:39:20, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Greater Hulstria
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageNo, you are trying to eliminate opposition and consolidate power. You have no good intentions with these acts.

Date02:44:09, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSectual Congress
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageFirst, it's our party's cabinet; the Lord Protector chairs it.

Second, and this shows that your statement doesn't make sense, the Coalition of Casual Sects only has one position in this proposed cabinet besides the Lord Protectorship. Every single party that has seats has at least one spot (almost all have two), so I'm actually doing the opposite of consolidating power.

Date03:09:27, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Greater Hulstria
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageIt is not your party's cabinet. It is the nation's cabinet, and this proposal is not in the best interests of the people.

Date10:12:24, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSectual Congress
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageYou're in the cabinet. It's amazing that you're complaining.

Date21:28:11, August 11, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Greater Hulstria
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageI will not be silence while you try to eliminate opposition.

Date23:02:43, August 11, 2007 CET
FromGao-Showa Imperial Party
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageIf anything they are giving the opposition more voice by putting us all on equal terms, it's a novel idea but not one we object to. You are being ridiculous.

Date14:32:34, August 12, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Party of Hulstria
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageI think this is a nice move to make a united Hulstria, we want to give a compliment to the lord protector for his involvements.

Date01:36:18, August 13, 2007 CET
FromSectual Congress
ToDebating the New New Cabinet Proposal of June 2441
MessageThank you, PLPH.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 448

no
  

Total Seats: 52

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

Random quote: "Unlike the world of free-markets, in political government when some individuals win, other individuals lose." - Robert Klassen

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75