We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administrative Movement Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Emblem Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2442
Description[?]:
| This bill will reconstitute sections of Administrative Acts, Bills and Laws |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The age at which a person is considered an adult (limited between 12 and 24).
Old value:: 18
Current: 18
Proposed: 16
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Current: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Proposed: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 60
Current: 60
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:32:02, August 13, 2007 CET | From | Nationalist-Militarist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Administrative Movement Act |
| Message | The Imperial-Nationalist Party(INP) agrees with most of the Articles of this bill. However, we suggest some modifications to this legislation. A list of opinions: Article 1-We agree with this proposal. It is a minor inconvenience for citizens to be required to carry I.D. The security benefits far outweigh the inconvenience. Article 2-We agree with this proposal. Immigrants should have to pass simple health and other test. This will keep our health secure from immigrant-borne diseases. Article 3-We agree with the idea of this proposal, but not the age. We propose the age in Article 3 be changed to 65, instead of 75. 75 is much too old. Article 4-We agree with this proposal. Our children mature much faster in this era and the age at which they are considered an adult should change to reflect this. Article 5-We agree with this proposal. Nationals should have to show they are literate and healthy in order to gain citizenship. This would motivate the illiterate to learn to read and also create a healthier environment. Article 6-We disagree with this proposal. The current system in place show needs of replacement and should be kept unchanged. |
| Date | 11:35:21, August 13, 2007 CET | From | Emblem Party | To | Debating the Administrative Movement Act |
| Message | Article 1: Proposal to change Government-issued identity card policy. A card policy would be an exelent way to carry Identification. If a man is hospitalized and no one call tell who he is, a card could inform doctors of who this man is and his possible allergies. It would also be good for informing the family. Article 2 & 5: Article 2 and have the same argument. Article 2: Proposal to change Government policy concerning granting nationality. (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights) Article 5: Proposal to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship. |
| Date | 11:52:29, August 13, 2007 CET | From | Emblem Party | To | Debating the Administrative Movement Act |
| Message | I'm deeply sorry, it cut me off mid stream. Continuing on, Article 2 and 5 (Now changed to article 4) are proposing mandatory tests on immigrants. This is because laws are different around the world and so are ours. What is legal in there country could be a capital offense in ours. Test will allow us to find out not only if there healthy, but if they can deal with the country. Article 3: Proposal to change The age at which a person is considered an adult. Kids these days can get a steady job and drive at the age of 16, two qualities that are mandatory for adulthood, and it is agreed our kids are maturing quickly. Article 4 has already been briefed Article 5: Proposal to change The professional retirement age. The longer you work, the more you make. Some jobs pay very little and by the time you've retired, you realized its not enough. At the age of 60 it would be impossible for anyone to hire you again. If the work age was 65 you could the extra 5 years, making sure you have the money in the bank. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 375 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 155 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |