Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5471
Next month in: 00:51:19
Server time: 07:08:40, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour party of Kafuristan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2443

Description[?]:

Make Minister of Justice more previleged.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:56:06, August 16, 2007 CET
FromSocial Justice Party
ToDebating the Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.
MessageWe oppose this oppressive policy. The Justice Minister may make a decision based on political bas.

Date18:08:42, August 16, 2007 CET
FromLabour party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.
MessageIt is not oppresive policy. All in all another court will be consider the case

Date18:41:25, August 16, 2007 CET
FromConservative Monarchistic Party
ToDebating the Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.
MessageOr not, if minister disagrees with appeal.

Date20:41:20, August 16, 2007 CET
FromLabour party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.
MessageBut it is not the same that bill concluded:
''Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court''.
Of course we could argue but we can argue on every bill in this game, there is lot of unprecised statements.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 103

no
   

Total Seats: 234

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "The honest politician is one who, when he is bought, stays bought." - Simon Cameron

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55