We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: GM Crops Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Reformation Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2447
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning genetically modified (GM) crops.
Old value:: There is no policy concerning GM crops.
Current: Production and selling of GM crops is banned. Research is allowed.
Proposed: All activities related to production, selling or researching of GM crops are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:44:48, August 18, 2007 CET | From | National Liberty Party | To | Debating the GM Crops Reform |
Message | Genetically modified crops offer radical new innovations to food production with worldwide implications, good and bad. The NLP would support more regulation of GM crops, but banning them altogether is a knee-jerk, close-minded response to a promising new technology. |
Date | 09:49:27, August 18, 2007 CET | From | Common Party | To | Debating the GM Crops Reform |
Message | I must agree with the NLP here. We cannot support the banning of a technology that can provide so much possible benefit to people. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 36 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 65 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 112 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "When anger rises, think of the consequences." - Confucius |