Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 02:11:50
Server time: 09:48:09, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Abolition of the Monarchy

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2445

Description[?]:

The DSP, feels that the monarchy is a useless aspect of government that hinders our nation by taking certain executive powers away from being democratically elected.

Therefore the the DSP proposes the Monarchy be abolished and Executive power be vested in a President and Prime Minister.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:29:55, August 19, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageThe SCP wholeheartedly supports this move.

Date00:45:37, August 20, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageWouldn't having two elected officials worsen partisanship overall in our government? A symbolic head of state does not interfere with the way the country is run at the moment, as opposed to the system you propose.

Date01:30:43, August 20, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageNot really.

The president, whom is the head of state is elected by the people.

The Prime Minister, whom is head of government is elected by the parliament.

In both cases they are voted for by the people, in the case of the PM it is more election through representation, but still.

Date03:33:50, August 20, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageRegardless, they still have to split some of the power that currently only the head of government uses. By giving this nation what is in effect two leaders, it'll simply increase political bureaucracy and cause legislative stagnation.

Who ever heard of a successful country with both a Prime Minister and a President?

Date05:04:36, August 20, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageI might have supported if you hadn't chosen such lifeless, dull titles. This bill would revert us to a blank, "brand-name" republic.

Date05:34:55, August 20, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageOOC: Make and then put together the roots for equivalent titles in Tsekwon and get back to DSP on this.

Date05:54:13, August 20, 2007 CET
FromSuperhuman Creation Party
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageIf it's not hereditary there's a chance a nigger will become the head of state and I won't have that. >:(

Date06:02:40, August 20, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageHow do you know the current royal family isn't black?

Date09:00:10, August 20, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageAbout 30 % of the RL world has a president and Prime Minister, apart from that it provides a further set of checks and balances, which is something needed in parliamentary systems.

What's the point in coming up with flamboyant titles, they don't really mean anything or affect the persons job.
However, if you want to suggest some, and it means you'll vote in favor of it, we'll do it.

The DSP/I do/es not recognize the idiots racists remark as legitimate.

Date23:46:03, August 20, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageYeah, but are they the SUCCESSFUL 30%?

I think I've made my point good sir.

:colbert:

Date00:16:31, August 21, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageI would say the majority of them are successful.

Date00:17:36, August 21, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageForgot to add, if the head of state and head of government were to be the same thing, and democratically elected, would you feel differently towards the abolition of the monarchy?

Date03:04:08, August 21, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the The Abolition of the Monarchy
MessageHonestly? Yes, since that would render my argument somewhat moot.

O:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 182

no
  

Total Seats: 176

abstain
   

Total Seats: 241


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to defend minorities." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78