Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 03:45:24
Server time: 04:14:35, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform for a Modern Society Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Feathercreek Ecological Partnership

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2446

Description[?]:

Many of Al'Badara's military laws are archaic and generally unpleasant. This bill seeks to improve the treatment of those involved with the military and steadily ease into a more civilized society in general.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:58:10, August 21, 2007 CET
FromChristian Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageHa,

The CNF has helped solve the homosexual problem, in fact the ink has hardly dried on the bill and you wish to propose such a radical change. We can not allow for homosexuals to be in the military. The CNF must also strongly oppose article 3. We can not weaken our stance on weapons that are vital to our defense when we live in a world of international terrorism and global conflict. If we don't protect ourselves who will?

Date08:14:42, August 21, 2007 CET
FromFeathercreek Ecological Partnership
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageFair enough, I suppose that it takes time to change a country such as this one. My party had predicted this sort of response, but I felt that it would be a small change, considering homosexuals can't do much anything else. Your viewpoint is duly noted but we have decided to keep the debate open for a short time longer before any revisions are to be made.

If we decided to cave in to your demands, would you accept a compromise, or are you so fervently opposed to the whole idea? I think we can both agree that whatever we decide, it should be in the best interest of all of our citizens.

Date08:55:13, August 21, 2007 CET
FromChristian Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageThe CNF can agree to Articles 2 and perhaps Article 3 but we can not in any way support Article 1.

Date09:04:56, August 21, 2007 CET
FromFeathercreek Ecological Partnership
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageDuly noted.

Date14:16:45, August 21, 2007 CET
FromAl'Badara Republican Party
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageACAP agrees with the CNF, although not as extreme on number one. We believe in the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. By banning homosexuals altogether, we would make a more preoccupied military in times of war.

Date15:50:11, August 21, 2007 CET
FromEnlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageThe Homophobic Nationalist Front has only created an intolerance problem, and has not cured any "homosexual" problem.

Date16:11:47, August 21, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Communist Party
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageThis is a bill the PSP can fully support.
However, they are all proposals that we have either supported in the past, and from experience we can say that they will not pass the Grand Majelis due to the dominance of the religious right.

Date18:12:29, August 21, 2007 CET
FromFeathercreek Ecological Partnership
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageFine. I will remove article one, but I feel any other changes will kill the spirit of the act. To those who are still skeptical of proposition 3, I implore you to think of the horror and tragedy caused by chemical and biological weapons, and the ecological, economical, and humanitarian devastation that often follows. We do not need this in a modern age. If war is not preventable, we should not stoop to attacking civilian targets. Also, with our new less aggressive system in place, perhaps there will be less aggression towards us? A strong, deliberate neutral country rarely gets invaded.

Date03:12:20, August 22, 2007 CET
FromEnlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageYeah. We know. Tell that to some of the other parties. If you get it passed, the DN! will forever love and respect you.

Date09:59:36, August 22, 2007 CET
FromUnified National Party
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageSorry. But the UNP believes the more danger an enemy sees in us, the more dettered they will be.

Date23:46:06, August 22, 2007 CET
FromEnlightened Cosmic Brotherhood
ToDebating the Military Reform for a Modern Society Act
MessageIndeed. The more aggressive we look the less attention we will grab from other aggressive nations. Nations that look to be itching for a war never go to war. Thats a fact.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 38

no
   

Total Seats: 42

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." - H. L. Mencken

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 82