Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 01:54:52
Server time: 22:05:07, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dnobb | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Solentia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2448

Description[?]:

The continued development of nuclear and chemical weapons presents great danger to Solentia. We must put out faith solely in diplomatic avenues. Nuclear and Chemical weapons represent a threat to peace.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:10:55, August 22, 2007 CET
FromWorkers Party
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageWe shall support this bill.

Yoko Susanasdöttir - Deputy Organisative Secretary, Workers Party

Date18:31:07, August 22, 2007 CET
FromFederal Independent Party
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageWe oppose. Defense of this nation is greater in value to us than what's internationally popular.

FIP Conservative Coalition Minority Leader Jerev Steton

---

We support. However, our move will be blocked by the Conservative Coalition within our party.

FIP Liberal Coalition Minority Leader Sherrod Brown

Date17:44:27, August 26, 2007 CET
FromFederal Independent Party
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageI must vote no on this proposal. Currently, there is really no inbetween law in place regarding N/B/C weaponries and what is proposed here is extreme and the existing law is extreme as well. Striving to maintain a situation where we can keep a sensible middleground is integral. Should a reformed bill be proposed, or one that I take the initiative to write and sponsor comes up to voting, support would be evidential.

FIP Ranking Senator Hugh Bure

Date15:16:09, August 27, 2007 CET
FromNew Centre and Unionists
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageThe defence of this nation is simply too large a price to pay for our leaders to do what is seen as "Peaceful".
If another nation were, for whatever reason, to attack us utilising chemical, biologicl or nucleat warfare, it would be the hight of stupidity to deliberatly deny ourselves to right and opportunity to defend ourselves.

The UPD votes a strong: no.

Date16:03:14, August 27, 2007 CET
FromLabour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageThe defence of this nation is too important at this stage certainly.

Date11:30:55, August 28, 2007 CET
FromNew Centre and Unionists
ToDebating the Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weaponary Reform Bill 2445
MessageThe UPD opposes on the basis of; Good, strong ideals,but impossible implimentation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 174

no
    

Total Seats: 251

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77