We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reformed Progressive Science Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Biologic Reform Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2446
Description[?]:
| Lets us move forward together. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:00:05, August 22, 2007 CET | From | Pantheism Capitalistic Party UCF | To | Debating the Reformed Progressive Science Act |
| Message | Our party cannot support this bill. Animals should not be tested upon, even if the testing is regulated. |
| Date | 18:56:44, August 22, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Reformed Progressive Science Act |
| Message | Using animals to test something as useless as cosmestics is a disgusting act and we will never support it. |
| Date | 19:14:19, August 22, 2007 CET | From | Biologic Reform Party | To | Debating the Reformed Progressive Science Act |
| Message | This bill was a response to the earlier Progressive Science Act in which debate showed the communist party infavor or article 1 but not article 2. This Bill is article 1. |
| Date | 06:37:44, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Reformed Progressive Science Act |
| Message | ooc - yeah, I got the numbers mixed up a little. sorry about that. |
| Date | 07:26:45, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Emblem Party | To | Debating the Reformed Progressive Science Act |
| Message | Cosmetics shouldn't be tested on animals. If cosmetics are that deadly that we cant do it our selves, then they shouldn't be cosmetics. We agree with animal testing on dangerous matters. Such as some forms of drugs and chemical research used for major surgery, but not cosmetics. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 236 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 368 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 46 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The spirit of democracy is not a mechanical thing to be adjusted by abolition of forms. It requires change of heart." - Mahatma Gandhi |