Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 00:34:16
Server time: 07:25:43, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Bureaucrat | lulus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform Act 2445

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2446

Description[?]:

We feel these changes are necessary in modern day Telamon.

(please note that article 1 is what most modern western nations has irl, I have earlier encountered people who didnt realize this and called it totalitarian, basically it means that if serious riots or chaos step in will the military be allowed to assist the police to establish law and order - this need government approval though as a state of emergency has to be declared first).

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:51:49, August 22, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageThanks for the nice lengthy debate period, by the way.

Date18:11:15, August 22, 2007 CET
FromRegional Acronym Political Establishment
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageArticle 2 conflicts with the Military Big Stick Proposal which was recently passed and which you voted for. Explain yourself.

Date18:49:03, August 22, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageI think the Centre Party is a little confused.

Date19:07:21, August 22, 2007 CET
FromRegional Acronym Political Establishment
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageWhy on earth would we wait for someone to use a nuclear weapon before we use one? It's like Russian Roulette but we always have to go first.

It is this kind of erratic behavior that makes it clear the Centre Party is not fit for leadership.

Date23:00:48, August 22, 2007 CET
FromTelamonese Cultural Alliance
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageArticle 2 is rancidly objectionable, as much as we like Article 1.

Date23:48:11, August 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageIt was a mistake when we voted for the earlier proposal, we cannot support random use of WMD...

Nor can we accept a society standing still without doing anything in a state of emergency situation.

Date23:48:57, August 22, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Act 2445
MessageFurthermore did we not discuss this as there is little to debate... And was fairly sure a majority already supported this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 42

no
   

Total Seats: 33

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

    Random quote: "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than wait for it to abolish itself from below." - Alexander II of Russia

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68