We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Environment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Gardien d'Environnement
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2447
Description[?]:
| We must not forget the nature, we must act for the preservation of pristine nature areas, and promote environmental sound technology. For without nature, what are we? Dead. [Translation: Increase the budget for R&D for environmental studies, create animal sanctuaries around Jelbania and reduce taxes for environment friendly cars and such.] |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Proposed: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government promotes forest clearance.
Current: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Current: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:56:51, August 22, 2007 CET | From |  Lib-Gov Party-part of W.A-S.U | To | Debating the National Environment Act |
| Message | We agree |
| Date | 21:51:34, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the National Environment Act |
| Message | We agree completely. Let's hope this viewpoint will have a majority after the next election. |
| Date | 18:31:05, August 24, 2007 CET | From | Jesuék avé Avjogadék Kàticképylz | To | Debating the National Environment Act |
| Message | We agree completely |
| Date | 19:38:50, August 25, 2007 CET | From | Centre Démocratique | To | Debating the National Environment Act |
| Message | It's unfortunate that this could not be a unanimous vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 60 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 40 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |