We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Keeping out Undesirables
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Nationalist Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2446
Description[?]:
The people have spoken, they do not care for the undesirables outside of our country. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Constitution of the United Majatran Republic.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Proposed: The government does not allow foreign embassies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:47:49, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | Excellent idea. First movement: The CNF. |
Date | 01:55:35, August 23, 2007 CET | From | People's Communist Party | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | The PSP has to wonder whether the CNF has really considered the diplomatic implications here. Al'Badara currently hosts many foreign embassies and diplomats from all over the world. If we were to expel them all, it would have grave consequences for both our international standing and our trade prospects. We are inclined to think that this is a cynical vote-manipulating ploy by the CNF to try and make themselves appear more isolationist, when in fact it just makes them appear even further removed from reality. |
Date | 02:11:10, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Christian Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | Perhaps its time for you foreign lovers to look at the wants of our people. They don't care for the outside world, in fact this bill reflects the peoples wishes perfectly and voting against it truly shows that the parties against this bill are loosing touch with the nation. |
Date | 06:51:49, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Feathercreek Ecological Partnership | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | CNF, these personal attacks are unacceptable in a professional setting. This also applies to Democracy Now to a certain extent. Although we can do nothing to halt this quarrel, the partnership urges you to act like civilized people. Be the better man. |
Date | 07:02:44, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Christian Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | Personal Attacks? Unlikely, the CNF is attempting to expose the truth of the matter to the people so that the know exactly what they are voting for. |
Date | 07:06:56, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Feathercreek Ecological Partnership | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | Call it whatever you'd like. I will not get involved any further with this juvenile feud. |
Date | 16:52:58, August 23, 2007 CET | From | Enlightened Cosmic Brotherhood | To | Debating the Keeping out Undesirables |
Message | We're unsure where the CNF gets it's information, but the people of Al'Badara don't hate the outside world. Want to know about the people of Al'Badara? They are PROGRESSIVE, SECULAR, and PERMISSIVE. Certainly the CNF represents the majority, because we've all seen how Progessive they are (No Gays, No "Undesirables), how Secular they are (Christians need to rule all, Government should be a theocracy), and how Permissive they are (No Gays, No Gambling, No Privacy). True, Al'Badara is isolationist, but this is in regards to foreign affairs and foreign wars. We live in TERRA, Not inside the head of the CNF's leaders. Furthermore, the CNF has never been guilty of "exposing" any truths. They ignore anything that disproves their outdated theories and continue to push for oppression of everyone except the Christian Minority. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 34 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 46 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell |