Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:08:49
Server time: 13:51:10, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum

Details

Submitted by[?]: Saiken Renmei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2447

Description[?]:

The new state religion for the Pan-Sekowan government is Hellenic polytheism, but each city-state shall have the liberty to have one or no official religion.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:00:49, August 23, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum
MessageThe DSP is vehemently opposed to any sort of state religion.
Sekowo must remain a secular nation.

Date21:29:28, August 23, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum
MessageThe SCP opposes state religion.

Date04:59:58, August 24, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum
MessageI agree with the RP portion whole-heartedly, and I thank the CFP for making it, but I have to oppose the articles for political reasons.

Date12:56:22, August 24, 2007 CET
FromSaiken Renmei
ToDebating the Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum
Message@ AUP: You have nothing to lose if you vote for this law, it will probably change your party's ideology from convinced secular to moderate secular or secular-leaning.

Date20:22:21, August 25, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Lex de religione antiqua Graecorum
Messageyeah, I guess you're right. I would vote for just article 1 then.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 122

no
     

Total Seats: 358

abstain
  

Total Seats: 95


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "[In the West] unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kept dark, without any need for an official ban." - George Orwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66