We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecological Priority
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2447
Description[?]:
| We have an idea that focus on issues such as international stability, technology improvement and science projects will be better to overcome enviromental issues and will do it faster and more effective. We do not need these old views similar to enviromental dictatorship, we need to change our traditional views and challenge our ideas. Furthermore we need to accept that fundamentalist enviromentalism only keeps us in a state where problems is seen everywhere. Why not loosen up and think creative and innovative. On a more practical level we propose (in response to our promise from previous legislation: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=125008) to organise a Wild Animal Keeping Security Agency (WAKSA) to operate and control security together with servicing the people interested in and keeping wild animals. This body shall grant license and register the keeping of wild animals. WAKSA shall also operate field units to control the safety and the security of the keeping of wild animals together with making sure that the necessary meassures to ensure they can't escape and harm the general public is taken. WAKSA shall make a list on which wild animals is allowed under which circumstances together with which meassures must be taken regarding individual animals as well as the types of animals in general. WAKSA shall include a psychological unit who shall operate as the security field unit and control the psychological aspects of individual animals and whether further security is needed or whether a license shall be prolonged. We believe that with WAKSA it will be more controlled and also more safe to keep wild animals. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government encourages, but does not require new and replacement plantation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 162 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 177 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward." - Franklin D. Roosevelt |