We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Changing our Name
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2448
Description[?]:
| Ok, after thinking about this we/I propose that we change, or rather shorten our name. We our comprised of several federated regions and city-states, which makes us a Federation. So we/I propose we change our name to the Federation of Sekowo or the Sekowan Federation. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:56:01, August 26, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | We support such a change. |
| Date | 08:14:50, August 27, 2007 CET | From |  Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | I find federation a bit too bland. Although we shouldn't aim for flamboyant names "just because," we should remember that particracy provides a place for innovative political experimentation that couldn't happen in the real world. The "people" of Sekowo won't suffer because the city-state system, just as they won't prosper because we declare a more level-headed federation. So let's have some fun. For example, if we do make a federation, let's make, for a back story, that it is highly decentralized. The regions themselves would act like quasi-sovereign states. No one would hail from Sekowo, but from their home state. There might even be some territorial conflict... (cf. Toledo War). |
| Date | 08:25:26, August 27, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | We can't really make up alot of history since most of it is already existant in the wikia. I was thinking more along the way the States in the US are. |
| Date | 16:19:04, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | I wrote most of the history of the of last 200 years. I'd be happy to modify it. In any case, the decentralized nature of Sekowo is pretty clear, seeing what happened in the civil war... |
| Date | 23:02:52, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | If you go with an idea like that, I would enjoy roleplaying a party kinda based on the patriote/separatist idea. |
| Date | 01:40:55, August 28, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | I'm gonna put this up to vote now. We can figure out history stuff and such after that. |
| Date | 03:55:50, August 29, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | I'd rather that we figure it out now. I don't want to be shortchanged into an "average" federation due to later inaction. |
| Date | 04:46:26, August 29, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing our Name |
| Message | Well this bill just means we're going to change it, it does'nt mean we are'nt going to work out the details. I mean considering we do have to ask for a name change, the time between the bill passing and actually getting the name changed is gonna be a few days most likely, so we can figure it out than. Also, I think we should base it on the publics feelings, like government responsibility, economic regulation, government size and unitary v. devolved, since than it would be more realistic. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 204 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 69 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 326 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun... our principle is to have the Party control the gun and never allow the gun to control the Party." - Mao Zedong |