We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: segregationism in solentia
Details
Submitted by[?]: knights party of solentia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2448
Description[?]:
| criminality is one of major problems of solentia. whit segragationists laws we try to eliminete this problem |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:57:41, August 26, 2007 CET | From |  Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | The Workers Party is against such fascist proposal. |
| Date | 23:06:55, August 26, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | sucking communist i'm not fascist |
| Date | 23:11:55, August 26, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | You may call yourself whatever. You are a racist bastard; go to hell. |
| Date | 23:18:59, August 26, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | yes i'm racist and i'm proud to be racist. fucking islam friend communist |
| Date | 01:51:02, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | One, I didn't really understand what you said in the bill description. You need a license to decipher such horrific grammar and spelling. Second, this has no actual legislation in the bill. Nothing will happen once it passes. This isn't even a binding resolution. It has nothing within the description and is poorly written. FIP Ranking Senator Irton Dedril ((OOC: Third, I would be wise and end this profanity in this debate. Not only is it in poor taste, it is technically out of conduct since it is not set in the tone of a person. If this is kept up I will not refrain from reporting the unpleasantries presented here to the moderators.)) |
| Date | 01:52:38, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Federal Independent Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | ((OOC: Oh yes, "segregationism" isn't a real word, by the way.)) |
| Date | 02:16:16, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | We shall fight this barbaric "law" to the end. In the Senate and in the streets. Anna Basuto - Unionist movement secretary, Workers Party. And proudly African-Solentian, by the way. |
| Date | 03:42:58, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Independent Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | How can you call this a bill this is nothing. Other than the horrible spelling and grammer i dont even know what this bill is for. IP Leader, Jack Carver |
| Date | 03:59:04, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | (OOC: Capitalization is your friend. It makes all the difference between "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse" and "I helped my uncle jack off a horse." Also, Wow. Go away. Racism went out of style in the 20th century.) |
| Date | 04:22:20, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | My mother is Icelandic, my father was Japanese. So in which side of your segregated society do I belong, or are you going to tear me asunder to fit your barbaric ideas? Or perhaps my own existence should be verbotten, as I am, eh, a "mongrel"? Yoko Susanasdöttir - Deputy Organisative Secretary, Workers Party |
| Date | 09:32:20, August 27, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | i don't know let me think |
| Date | 09:34:29, August 27, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | no you are not segregate. |
| Date | 13:38:03, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Party of Solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | ((OOC: If you haven't got anything nice to say, don't say it at all =] )) |
| Date | 15:02:56, August 27, 2007 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | The Union for Progression and Development asks if there is actually a point or purpose to this bill? |
| Date | 15:07:45, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | Thanks for not wanting to tear Yoko apart, it could become somewhat messy. But if me and my wife wish to go out for dinner, we must go to separate restaurants, because she's, in your enlightned way of expression, a "nigger"? François Hewington - Deputy Chairman, Workers Party |
| Date | 15:08:03, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Workers Party | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | Thanks for not wanting to tear Yoko apart, it could become somewhat messy. But if me and my wife wish to go out for dinner, we must go to separate restaurants, because she's, in your enlightned way of expression, a "nigger"? François Hewington - Deputy Chairman, Workers Party |
| Date | 15:19:02, August 27, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | you must to go in prison because you married a nigger. this is misgenation. ah you must go ton the nigger restaurant because you are the husband of a nigger woman. |
| Date | 15:29:52, August 27, 2007 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | If the Workers Party and the Knights Party of Solentia have absolutly nothing of value or substance to contribute, silence would be deemed as most appropriate. |
| Date | 22:24:39, August 27, 2007 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | I do not feel that this legislation would be of bennefit to the country. |
| Date | 22:28:19, August 27, 2007 CET | From | Labour Party of Solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | I don't think this legidslation is appropriate in rebuilding our country. |
| Date | 22:41:25, August 27, 2007 CET | From | knights party of solentia | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race; the constitutional right to choose one's associates; to accept private employment without governmental interference, and to learn one's living in any lawful way. We oppose the elimination of segregation, the repeal of miscegenation statutes, the control of private employment by Federal bureaucrats called for by the misnamed civil rights program. We favor home-rule, local self-government and a minimum interference with individual rights. |
| Date | 22:53:43, August 27, 2007 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the segregationism in solentia |
| Message | Ah I see. Not going with the Traditional Political Strategy of supporting what the people want then? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 425 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I think you should defend to the death their right to march, and then go down and meet them with baseball bats." - Woody Allen, on the Ku Klux Klan |