Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 03:04:12
Server time: 04:55:47, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Industry Stimulant Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2096

Description[?]:

Fellow politicians,

I consulted our countries industrial climate lately and the result weren't all that possitive.
On 4/5 of the disctricts, the outcome turned out to be low to average.
The only advantage of this is the low pollution in our district's environment.

The cause of this is based on 3 major areas:
* lack of technology.
* industrial unhospitality climate due high taxes. (other proposal)
* high ecologic restrictions.

Although small-industry does provide the labor market with some number of jobs, it still is unsufficient.

KP wants to propose 2 articles to stimulate industries in developing and growth.

Article 1: Stimulate technology research and development - our country does not offer the possibility to patent technology work, this is a serious supresses engineers to create new techniques and machinery because if they bring it on the market, they cannot ensure the they will earn money on their project. So we want to obtain engineers with the option to protect their work by patenting it.

Article 2: Lowering down pollution restrictions towards moderate level - is still enough to ensure a healthy environment for our citizens and it takes away the 'ecology-burden' (materially and financially) from the industries.

Suggestions are welcome

Regards

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:29:07, August 14, 2005 CET
From CCP
ToDebating the Industry Stimulant Act
MessageHonorable Colleagues,

We are especially encouraged regarding the conscientious and pragmatic manner with which our Colleagues within the Kommunist Party approach our Nation's resources. While we can never be sure of the full affects of actions in our complex market environment, we are comforted by the knowledge that we can adjust our actions when they are found to be unfavorable for our Nation's interests. If we can agree to revisit this and other market-related legislation at regular intervals, we will fully support our Colleagues' comprehensive economic program, and look forward to studying it again when we can better ascertain its affects.

Date18:29:58, August 14, 2005 CET
From CCP
ToDebating the Industry Stimulant Act
MessageIf there are no objections, we move that the item be called directly to vote.

Date19:18:59, August 15, 2005 CET
FromBeach Party
ToDebating the Industry Stimulant Act
MessageWhile weary of pollution, we see the need to stimulate industry.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 66

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 9


    Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

    Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54