Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:41:09
Server time: 11:18:50, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ImperialLodamun | RogueALD | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2448

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Pluralism Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2449

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:47:25, August 29, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageHow come you have not made yourself head of government?

Date02:07:47, August 29, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageI do find myself somewhat curious as well.

Although I do find your abilities at compromise rather refreshing compared to most bills proposed (including mine. :) )

Date02:12:22, August 29, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageI do find myself somewhat curious as well.

Although I do find your abilities at compromise rather refreshing compared to most bills proposed (including mine. :) )

Date02:12:45, August 29, 2007 CET
FromAristocracy United
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageWhy the hell am I double-posting so much recently? My connection is fine on this end. =/

Date03:48:19, August 29, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageI figure that I can't have every important position just because I'm the largest party; without outside support, I'm powerless. I'd rather have defense and foreign ministry than HoG; having all three wouldn't be very equitable and I'm sure that you would see that.

Date04:50:48, August 29, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageWe would actually probably have voted for it had you kept that position.

Date05:30:59, August 29, 2007 CET
From Imperial Pluralism Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageI guess it's all about good communication

Date06:30:31, August 29, 2007 CET
From Chattes en Chaleur
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageI would vote yes on this one if the Commies got HoS

Date15:36:22, August 31, 2007 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2448
MessageThe SCP would have supported this cabinet had it received the Ministry of Finance in exchange for the Ministry of Justice.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 295

no
    

Total Seats: 304

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70