We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2449
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2449
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Free Democrats
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the I need to make new party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Baltusian Pantian Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the I need to make new party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Baltusian Pantian Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the I need to make new party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Free Democrats
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the I need to make new party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Baltusian Pantian Alliance
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:50:03, September 02, 2007 CET | From | I need to make new party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Baltusian Pantian Alliance?? hahaha... He would probably burn the trees for raw materials for a upcoming war and draft the tourists into his own private militia... hahahaha... Education?? Like brainwashing kids to think its okay for a pair of pants to be in charge of internal affairs.. hehehe Anyhow it looks good besides that. Liberal Party should of been in there somewhere though |
| Date | 19:03:25, September 02, 2007 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | Majority = 151 votes? |
| Date | 23:34:27, September 02, 2007 CET | From | Baltusian Pantian Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | Your obviously to retarded to look into the history of the BPA's Environmental support its to bad not every other opposition we have is as ignorant to the truth as you are. Anyways the BPA holds nothing agianst the governing powers of the two others in this cabinet that are not the UIF, however on that note giving our support to a cabinet that includes a party so obviously ignorant to capable governance we have to decline our support of this proposal. |
| Date | 00:08:06, September 03, 2007 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | Asleep on the keyboard? Only shows your intolerance and self-ascribed incompetence, BPA. |
| Date | 00:13:48, September 03, 2007 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | The Baltusian Pantian Alliance is not incompetent. The people of Baltusia definitly like their party or else they wouldn't vote for them. The BPA has been elected Praetor/Consul more times then you. They have been elected 8 times, now lets see, how many times have you won? None |
| Date | 03:49:13, September 03, 2007 CET | From | I need to make new party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | You know why he got elected so many times??? He and orange party actually admitted it once.... Its because they where the only decent parties around for a long time and any time someone new came around they would bash them and keep them down and make them not play the game. And if that didnt work they would just use there political alliances to make sure that they get no seats. They already drove Conservative party away... That was a pity. Now you can see that orange party is the lowest number of seats in the country and BPA is only gaining some back after a recent depression cause he had to change his views... Like having a police state. Anyhow seeing all he can do is call me ignorant and incompetent... Even though he has no proof to say such... Thats his view though and Im not going to take it away... No matter how "retarded" (as he would put it) it is. Think of this a a baby's temper.... BPA is angry that other parties have been doing better then his own. And he is pissed off at me cause he needs... To blame someone for his problems |
| Date | 05:09:53, September 03, 2007 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | Are you a multi? You refered to yourself alot when it should have been the Libertarians you spoke of. I don't think you are, however, that was a little strange. |
| Date | 09:12:31, September 03, 2007 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2449 |
| Message | "Its because they where the only decent parties" Maybe rationality has returned early to the Absurdists. This is quite shocking. "and any time someone new came around they would bash them and keep them down and make them not play the game." No that was just the Liberals and, well, now you. If you going to act like a fool (hence Absurdists, I suppose) then you will be treated like one. "They already drove Conservative party away... That was a pity. " Really? That's funny. I don't recall anything to that effect being said. Though, if true, they showed a lot more dignity about it than you Absurdists have. "BPA is only gaining some back after a recent depression cause he had to change his views... Like having a police state." Research is your friend. The BPA has always been in favour of a police state. They've just been quieter about it lately. "Even though he has no proof to say such" http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=126257 - That at least is proof of your ignorance. "BPA is angry that other parties have been doing better then his own" No, only you take the elections and seat numbers seriously enough to derive some sort of RL emotion from it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 96 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 95 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person." - Mother Teresa |