We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Keeping our children safe from diseases
Details
Submitted by[?]: Secular Humanist party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2450
Description[?]:
Our current laws allow exemption from child vaccination for silly religious or idealogical reasons. WE believe it is utterly stupid to allow a child's life to be put in danger because of some silly superstition. Farthermore, this is also illegal. As religions are rightfully outlawed in telamon. Think on this logical fallacy. Our laws allow CRIMINALS exemption. Criminals are allowed to put their childrens lives in danger. This is utterly ridiculous and must change. Child vaccination must be compulsory, to ensure the future of our nation againsa the horrors of disease. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on vaccinations.
Old value:: The government mandates vaccination for all children, but parents may opt out for religious or ideological reasons.
Current: The government mandates vaccination for all children.
Proposed: The government mandates vaccination for all children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:14:32, September 02, 2007 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Keeping our children safe from diseases |
Message | We do not believe in forcing people to accept any medical treatment. The TTIEU will vote no on this. |
Date | 21:56:54, September 02, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Keeping our children safe from diseases |
Message | People is one thing. Educated adults who can choose. Children do not have such mental faculties. They must be immunised while they are young. They cannot make an informed choice, and anyone who would withold treatment on religious or ideological is clearly similarly lacking the mental faculties to make a decision. |
Date | 22:33:41, September 02, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Keeping our children safe from diseases |
Message | I would be more inclined to vote yes to "The government encourages vaccinations for children, but does not enforce them." |
Date | 09:05:07, September 03, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Keeping our children safe from diseases |
Message | That would be a step backwards, and would put many children at risk because parents are too lazy. There are a great many parents who are not as responsible as one would expect from someone charged with the care of a child. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 390 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 316 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "Colonialism or imperialism, as the slave system of the West is called, is not something that is just confined to England or France or the United States. The interests in this country are in cahoots with the interests in France and the interests in Britain. It's one huge complex or combine, and it creates what's known not as the American power structure or the French power structure, but an international power structure. This international power structure is used to suppress the masses of dark-skinned people all over the world and exploit them of their natural resources." Malcolm X |