Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 02:26:20
Server time: 21:33:39, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dannypk19 | hexaus19 | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Citizenship Definition

Details

Submitted by[?]: Radical Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2100

Description[?]:

This bill is to require all nationals to take a qualifying exam to earn citizenship. According to law, an immigrant must pass a test to become a national. The Radical Conservative Party believes that a person must be knowledgable of the country in order to vote.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:59:39, August 15, 2005 CET
From Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageAgainst

Date04:04:32, August 15, 2005 CET
From Radical Conservative Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageI'm gonna get you guys on one, one day. One day...

Date04:07:43, August 15, 2005 CET
From Radical Conservative Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
Message(Bangs head on table) Must...(bang)...have...(bang)...good idea.

Date04:56:38, August 15, 2005 CET
From Third Way Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageWhat are you going to do if a person does not pass your test? How will the test be made in a way that is not discriminatory?

Date09:47:37, August 15, 2005 CET
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageI'm gonna vote no on this one, sorry. I agree that imigrants should have to pass a test, and thats the way it is, but not nationals.

Date21:02:45, August 15, 2005 CET
From Radical Conservative Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageIf immigrants can do it, why can't the nationals?

Date12:49:19, August 16, 2005 CET
From Democratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageIn responce to the RCP, because for nationals its unnecessary and a bit of a civil rights problem. When are you going to test them? Obviously not when they're first born. So when they're 18, when they can first start voting? Fine, but currently they've been living under these laws for 18 years before they can vote anyway, surely they should get an oppurtunity to change them? The government shouldn't be able to set tests for who can and can't vote for nationals, its just too open to corruption. Its a necessary evil for immigrants, as they can potentionally vote after being in the country less than a couple of years, so it is possible without the tests they wouldn't know enough to vote sensibly. Someone who's been living in the country for 18 years however, and was brought up there, is likely to have picked up a bit of knowledge about the country, certianly enough to vote. That's my opinion anyway. I like parts of the idea in theory, it adds to the whole equality thing, but in practice I think its a bit pointless and detracts from peoples' civil rights more than necessary.

Date09:04:13, August 17, 2005 CET
From Liberty Party
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageThe Liberty Party supports, in principle, the notion that people who desire to come to a country permanently should demonstrate some sort of commitment to join in with the community. However, we cannot see how this can reasonably be done in practice, and until then we cannot vote for any measure that requires testing.

Date18:41:38, August 21, 2005 CET
From Sotsial-Demokraticheskaya Partiya
ToDebating the Citizenship Definition
MessageThis bill is a good idea, but only immigrants should take because a person born in this nation shouldn't take a test just to have rights.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 217

no
      

Total Seats: 337

abstain
  

Total Seats: 1


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74