Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 02:51:09
Server time: 13:08:50, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New Royal House Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Telamonese Cultural Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2451

Description[?]:

Rather than put it up to an election, the head of state will temporarily revert to elected, but every party should support the same candidate to show their support for a Telamonese Monarchy. We propose Thomas I, a minor prince from Hutori, as the new High King of the Commonwealth. If the Commonwealth Congress is dissatisfied with Thomas's performance, we will choose another new High King at the new election.

Voting on this bill will be deferred until after the 2450 elections. We would encourage republican parties to state that they are such in order to get a headcount on the likely effectiveness of this act.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:50:05, September 04, 2007 CET
FromUnited Labour Party of Telamon
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageThe TTIEU is against any monarchy.

Date13:57:50, September 04, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageThe TTIEU is wise in some matters. This is one of them.

Date16:22:08, September 04, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageWell then see it this way, an elected king is in any circumstances better then a heraditary king - if we are to follow the TTIEUs viewpoint...

Date18:57:22, September 04, 2007 CET
FromTelamonese Cultural Alliance
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageHow about we let the voters decide whether they want a Monarchy or a Republic? We pass this, then all the Monarchist parties support one candidate (Thomas I), and all the Republican parties support another (President Woogily Woobsy or whatever). If the Monarchist candidate wins, then Telamon will be a Monarchy and Thomas I will be given heriditary rule. If the Republican candidate wins, then we'll change the title to "Supreme Proctor" or whatever.

Date00:23:10, September 06, 2007 CET
FromUnited Labour Party of Telamon
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageThat would be a good idea.

Date19:39:26, September 06, 2007 CET
FromNational Soviet Party
ToDebating the New Royal House Act
MessageBeing the Emperor I am against this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 134

no
    

Total Seats: 499

abstain
  

Total Seats: 117


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69