Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 01:58:14
Server time: 22:01:45, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Interstellar. | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Law Enforcement Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Telamonese Cultural Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2451

Description[?]:

Currently, our justice system is hamstrung by silly laws. This act would remove one of them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:51:54, September 04, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageWe are uncertain about article 2, but vehemently opposed to article 1. We would not support this bill as is.

Date16:29:33, September 04, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageWe are supportive of article 1 but not article 2.

Date23:31:44, September 04, 2007 CET
FromRegional Acronym Political Establishment
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageWe like article 2, but not article 1. We will support this bill as is.

Date00:07:24, September 05, 2007 CET
FromUnited Labour Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageThe TTIEU supports article 1, but not article 2.

Date10:00:12, September 05, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageYou made an utterly stupid decision in pushing this forward combined, instead of splitting it in two.

Date20:34:58, September 05, 2007 CET
FromNational Soviet Party
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageWe support 2 but not 1

Date01:28:16, September 06, 2007 CET
FromSecular Humanist party
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageYou failed to state a Curfew time in the bill description.
This proposal is now too vague to be worth anyting, and should be summarily dismissed.

In any case, we are strongly against restricting people's movement. We believe everyone should have the right to enjoy telamon at any time of day or night. Enforcing a curfew is a massive waste of police resources, too, and does little good to anyone.

Date01:46:38, September 06, 2007 CET
FromUnited Labour Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Law Enforcement Reform Act
MessageThe TTIEU, after a party vote, has decided to change the party platform to be against all curfews.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 27

no
     

Total Seats: 606

abstain
  

Total Seats: 117


Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69