We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law Enforcement Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamonese Cultural Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2451
Description[?]:
Currently, our justice system is hamstrung by silly laws. This act would remove one of them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: No curfew policies may be established.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: Local governments may set curfews, but national government does not.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:51:54, September 04, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | We are uncertain about article 2, but vehemently opposed to article 1. We would not support this bill as is. |
Date | 16:29:33, September 04, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | We are supportive of article 1 but not article 2. |
Date | 23:31:44, September 04, 2007 CET | From | Regional Acronym Political Establishment | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | We like article 2, but not article 1. We will support this bill as is. |
Date | 00:07:24, September 05, 2007 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | The TTIEU supports article 1, but not article 2. |
Date | 10:00:12, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | You made an utterly stupid decision in pushing this forward combined, instead of splitting it in two. |
Date | 20:34:58, September 05, 2007 CET | From | National Soviet Party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | We support 2 but not 1 |
Date | 01:28:16, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | You failed to state a Curfew time in the bill description. This proposal is now too vague to be worth anyting, and should be summarily dismissed. In any case, we are strongly against restricting people's movement. We believe everyone should have the right to enjoy telamon at any time of day or night. Enforcing a curfew is a massive waste of police resources, too, and does little good to anyone. |
Date | 01:46:38, September 06, 2007 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Law Enforcement Reform Act |
Message | The TTIEU, after a party vote, has decided to change the party platform to be against all curfews. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 27 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 606 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 117 |
Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician |