We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aryan Kommunisten Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2451
Description[?]:
A cult and a religion are too very different things, while religions are responsible and peaceful, seeking only to increase their folk. While we must regard a cult as a religion gone rouge. Anything faith that falls into these categories shall be regarded a cult. 1: If any religion spots promoting itself lawfully, or becomes violent, the government shall, in right of thought and law, regard it a cult. 2: If any religion violates it inherent political naturally, and becomes a front for and/or a funder of any political movement, the government shall, in right of thought and law, regard it a cult. 3: New religions that have not yet proven to be civilised, shall be regarded by the government, in right of thought and law, as a cult until proven innocent. NOTE: In this case the religion shall not be actively persecuted, but shall effectively be on "trial run". 4: Religions which violate human right in their ways, the government shall, in right of thought and law, regard it a cult. 5: Any religion that calls for holy war against another religion or a political movement and/or ideology (example: a holy war against communism), shall be regarded by the government, in right of thought and law, as a cult. 6: Any religion that enforces it's own laws on it's followers violently, shall be regarded by the government, in right of thought and law, as a cult. 7: Religions that are anti-Semitic, shall be regarded by the government shall, in right of thought and law, as a cult |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, but membership is completely voluntary.
Current: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Proposed: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:25:23, September 04, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | No. |
Date | 22:33:27, September 04, 2007 CET | From | Aryan Kommunisten Partei | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | Yes. |
Date | 01:25:57, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Jewish-Christian Alliance of Patriots | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | I agree |
Date | 02:34:50, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | Oppose. |
Date | 02:36:38, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | This is totalitatian leaning. We propose the following: - Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations. - The government selectively screens which religions are permitted to send missionaries to the nation. Certain religions are approved and travel is unregulated. This would enable an effective democratic control (not persecution!) over which could be considered a cult. Besides, the proposed change would disestablish the State church. We oppose this. |
Date | 14:54:33, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Power Party | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | We would like to know where this puts the hobaist community? Look it up in the wiki for more info on Hobaism... |
Date | 19:11:21, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Aryan Kommunisten Partei | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | “New” Hobaism and The Cult of B’stard are cults. The old version is fine. |
Date | 19:20:36, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | We much prefer the Conservative proposal, in this case. |
Date | 19:21:27, September 05, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Defence against dangerous cults act of 2450 |
Message | Which isn't to say we'd vote for it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 74 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 207 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
Random quote: "Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners." - Edward Abbey |