Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:57:29
Server time: 23:02:30, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Moderation | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Amendment to the Legal Aid Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Al'Badara Republican Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2451

Description[?]:

The AAP proposes that there should be limitations on who receives legal aid. Yes, a poor (monetarily) defendant who obviously cannot afford the retainer fee for a lawyer should receive legal aid. But the upper middle and upper class who can afford a lawyer should not receive legal aid. Why should we help people who already have a lot of money, this is clearly a waste of taxpayers' money!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:07:14, September 05, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageAs there is no "upper class" yet, we will not support this.


Date00:24:41, September 05, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageAs there is no "upper class" yet, we will not support this.


Date08:48:46, September 05, 2007 CET
FromChristian Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessagePM seems to live in delusion. Where there is want there is power, when there is power there is an upper class.

Date13:31:47, September 05, 2007 CET
FromAl'Badara Republican Party
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageI bet the leader of the PM himself lives in a slum, right?

Anyways, no matter where or when, there is always an upper class, even in the former Soviet Union. Perhaps the PM is thinking that everyone is too poor in this country or taking socialism (although more like communism) to the extreme!

Date02:18:03, September 06, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageI, the leader of the PM, am proud to say that I live with my humble brothers and sisters.

The PM has always protected the people since the Civil War, and has since then continued to fund and protect the People throughout the nation via various programmes launched specifically by the party.

We have fought and bled to establish equal rights amongst the citizen.

Date02:19:08, September 06, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageThere should be no special treatment whatsoever. Everyone stands equal to the law and to the judicial system, regardless of salary pay.

When charged with a crime, one is charged by the State, and should therefore be provided with a legal aid for free seeing as how the state is conducting the trial.

Date02:20:10, September 06, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageIf we start dividing up things like this, you might end up giving bad representation to people with lower income simply because they cannot afford "top lawyers". And that itself would be totally unacceptable.

The PM apologizes for the multiple posts.

Date14:57:54, September 06, 2007 CET
FromPeople's Mujaheddin
ToDebating the Amendment to the Legal Aid Act
MessageDN! sides up with a bourgeois opinion?

The PM thought the supposedly new leadership of the DN was more radical than the old, perhaps we were wrong.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 114

no
  

Total Seats: 37

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

    Random quote: "Changing the way we measure things is vital. So is decompartmentalising society making sure that economics and politics are not divorced from other crucial areas of life." - David Attenborough

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59