Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:53:44
Server time: 07:06:15, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Control over Foreign Visits

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Party of Solentia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2451

Description[?]:

We the Labour Party, propose to have stricter and tighter immigration and border controls over our country.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:45:13, September 05, 2007 CET
FromLabour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageWe the Labour Party feels, the time is right to increase the strcitness of our border controls, purely to maintain Law and Order. We feel that we need better controls over who is in our country, and after recent levels of terroism we need to increase security as much as possible.

Irene Edwards, Labour Foreign Minister

Date13:54:24, September 05, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageThe law as it is prevents most security issues, and further strictness at the border only serves to deter those who would aid our society from joining.

Andrew Ryan

Date18:39:54, September 05, 2007 CET
FromLabour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageIt doesn't deter anyone from joining, it simply gives a stronger security check on people coming into the country so that we as a nation are a safer and stronger one in the face of the threat of teroism. We as a centre left party, which to protect and look after our people, all we ask is stricter and stronger security laws on immigration borders so that we can ensure safety for our people. Detering people and not having multiculturalism is something which we don't want to happen- we welcome foreign visitors and other people to our country but we wish to do so in a safe and dignified manner. Not the one currently in place.

Irene Edwards, Labour Foreign Minister

Date18:42:38, September 05, 2007 CET
FromLabour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageCurrently we have minimum security, we ask for tight, strict and stronger security. We see this as a bill which simply protects our people and our country from danger- no more.

Mike Sullivan, Labour Internel Minister

Date20:31:31, September 05, 2007 CET
FromWorkers Party
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageThe Workers Party opposes this bill. The working class is international!

Sen. Gudrun Gonzales - Chairwoman, Workers Party

Date20:49:48, September 05, 2007 CET
FromLabour Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageAfter recent rumours, we must confirm this bill is not one of racisim or of negativly portraying multiculturalism, we simply want tighter security laws so that acts of terroism are impossible to achieve and so our country are safe from things such as terroism. We welcome Multiculturalism and Mixed Races, it is a key policy our Party holds and has practised for many years.

Irene Edwards, Labour Foreign Minister

Date22:04:48, September 05, 2007 CET
FromNew Centre and Unionists
ToDebating the Control over Foreign Visits
MessageThe UPD does not, as a general rule, support strict security measures on border control.

-Elodie Western-Parker; UPD Party Leader.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 193

no
     

Total Seats: 232

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63