We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Drug Freedoms Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Greens Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2452
Description[?]:
| What right to we have to tell someone what they can and cannot put into their bodies? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Current: The use of cannabis is legal.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:05:27, September 07, 2007 CET | From | Radical Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Drug Freedoms Act |
| Message | Them people will then expect treatment from our hospitals and will take up bed space, they will probably be unemployed because of it and be scoungning of the benefits. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 209 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 244 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 146 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Global warming, at least the modern nightmare vision, is a myth. I am sure of it and so are a growing number of scientists. But what is really worrying is that the world's politicians and policy makers are not." - David Bellamy |