We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The right to private property Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian People's Party (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2452
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:27:59, September 06, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the The right to private property Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, There's an important word in the current legislation: 'vital'. Besides: all land belongs to His Serene Majesty - those in possession of the deeds are "freehold tenants", if they bother to read the wording properly. I yield the floor, but not our power to govern our own Empire. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 35 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 65 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 5 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "A son can bear with equanimity the loss of his father, but the loss of his inheritance may drive him to despair." - Niccolo Machiavelli |