Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 03:38:03
Server time: 12:21:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Kubrick2 | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: UNC 2nd Ecology Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Loyalistische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2453

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:07:38, September 08, 2007 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the UNC 2nd Ecology Bill
MessageAs for Article 3, Regulation is needed to make sure disposal really works.

Date18:11:29, September 08, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the UNC 2nd Ecology Bill
MessageRemove the article concerning forest protection and we'll support this bill wholeheartedly.

Date01:27:40, September 09, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Social Democrat Party
ToDebating the UNC 2nd Ecology Bill
MessageIt is the party's belief that there is much value in article 2 however our concern centers upon the entirety of the private sector's role which we believe would lead to social injustice and as such we must oppose. Those who cannot afford or cannot generate adequate investment should still be entitled to appropriate waste disposal. The frequency of such disposal is however, in our view, an area of important discussion.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 131

no
     

Total Seats: 150

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59