We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: IMPORTANT: Cabinet Formation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alianse Progresivitāte
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2096
Description[?]:
Allows the "largest" parties to propose a coalition gov't, which would allow the Progressives to finally oust the DCP. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Proposed: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:03:56, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Liberal Party | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Cabinet Formation |
Message | We proposed this already. People really need to get to grips with just what's going on. End this damned confederacy talk, its creating confusion and uncertainty. People have no idea what they're voting for anymore. We put forward this proposal because nobody agreed with having every party propose a coalition but now everyone's had a change of heart over that proposal. So no, we won't back this now and would urge people to pay attention to developments or else the ridiculous chain of contradictory proposals will continue. |
Date | 21:30:54, August 15, 2005 CET | From | Alianse Progresivitāte | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Cabinet Formation |
Message | What's going in is that the smallest party in Parliament... sorry, the Federal-Secretariat... is still in power because of an error in our laws. If we continue to divide between these proposals, neither will pass. And I will not stand for the tiniest parties being allowed to propose bizarre coalitions. The Progressive Party has won the last two elections. It has earned the right to nominate a cabinet. I fully intend to vote against that cabinet proposal, but the Progressives deserve the chance to at least attempt to build a coalition, free from obstruction |
Date | 08:32:54, August 16, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Cabinet Formation |
Message | I see no reason why the smallest party should not be allowed to propose a coalition cabinet. Afterall, the largest party may be unable to persuade enough parties to support them. And certainly, the largest party should not be garunteed a posistion in government unless it actually holds a majority in Parliament anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 107 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 43 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey |