Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:07:46
Server time: 16:52:13, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | burgerboys | hexaus18 | Nileowen_Kir | R Drax | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Libertarian Act: Agriculture

Details

Submitted by[?]: Scientific Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2455

Description[?]:

Subsidies waste taxpayer money and interfere with the workings of the market, costing consumers more in the long run.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:24:16, September 11, 2007 CET
FromProgressive Socialist Party
ToDebating the Libertarian Act: Agriculture
MessageThe SLP seems to have a dream of a cannibalistic economy that use up all resources with no regards to the environment or future generations. We are opposed to article 2 of this bill as we see it as our moral responsibility to use natural resources in a sustainable way so that or children will also be able to have a flourishing economy.

Robert Lasalle
PSP speaker on Environment and Tourism

Date00:52:17, September 12, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic Labour Union
ToDebating the Libertarian Act: Agriculture
MessageThe DLU agrees completely with our PSP colleagues.

Marcus O'Reallius
Party Leader

Date03:34:02, September 12, 2007 CET
FromWorld Wrestling Federation
ToDebating the Libertarian Act: Agriculture
MessageBacking the Libertarians

Date13:45:17, September 12, 2007 CET
FromUnion of Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Libertarian Act: Agriculture
MessageThe SRP agrees with Article 1, but not 2, so opposed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 115

no
       

Total Seats: 129

abstain
 

Total Seats: 6


Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65