We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2456
Description[?]:
| The DSP, while supporting the dissolution of the monarchy, does not believe the bill went far enough. Therefore the DSP proposes that the Executive be split into two elected positions, and the titles changed. Head of State: Premier Head of Government: Chancellor |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:49:28, September 15, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | Ok, we're gonna bring up something from a decade ago. Since the mandatory vote explanation act passed, everyone, regardless of how they vote have to explain why, if you agree, just say you agree, if you don't, say any and all parts you don't agree with. |
| Date | 10:05:15, September 15, 2007 CET | From |  Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | CeC believes we should see how the current system pans out before changing it again. |
| Date | 10:09:02, September 15, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | How long is an adequate period of time? |
| Date | 10:22:47, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | Probably a decade would be fair in seeing how having the HoS and HoG as the same person works out. We could support changing the names now though. |
| Date | 10:28:44, September 15, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | Can we actually use two names even though there's technically only one position? That's been bothering me honestly. |
| Date | 17:31:13, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | I'm strongly opposed to 2 and 3. I would support a non-unity executive, however. |
| Date | 18:07:59, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Sekowan Communist Party | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | If we have a HoS and HoG, then put forth names for each, AUP, as you're asking to have your cake and eat it too. |
| Date | 18:14:57, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | I would have the same names that we had before: HoG: Archon HoS: Basileus |
| Date | 21:01:33, September 15, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | You know, historically we're suppose to be an amalgam nation with a heavy Spanish language influence from the colonization days, and there are the Japanese Gao-Showa near us, so why is it that everything is so greek? |
| Date | 21:03:30, September 15, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | I've removed the name changes for now. |
| Date | 22:03:41, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | We aren't Greek, there is no such thing as Greece. There are only the Shinjalans, who created a developed ancient civilization and organized themselves in poleis and exarchies. The reason such terms were not used until recently is the colonial influence, and the 50 years of totalitarian rule have scattered all that was left from the colonial culture, as most of the criollo-based population emigrated. OOC: Nobody seems to have ever tried to determine the culture of pre-colonial sekowo, so we were a sort of latin-american country without other significant influences. nobody now seems to be very found of a mexico-like sekowo, so the new culture is recently created, based on invented pre-colonial peoples. |
| Date | 22:05:34, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Saiken Renmei | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | We're fine with the current executive structure, we'll have to see how it works and then try to change it. |
| Date | 22:16:55, September 15, 2007 CET | From | Plato's Republican Party | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | The PRP feel that dividing the most important Governmental job into two separate positions will serve the nation well in the long run. |
| Date | 00:00:00, September 16, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Changing the Executive Structure Act of 2455 |
| Message | OOC: I had a culture thread, that had pre-sekowan culture supposed to be a mixture of Nordic, Japanese and North Amerindian, but I've been developing it slowly, for instance the Kli'kut are supposed to have been one of the original cultures in the area, and they are a mostly supposed to be based on North Americans with some Japanese style and some Buddhism from cultural blending. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 302 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 297 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller |