Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:20:48
Server time: 12:39:11, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Luzzina | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Police Act of 2456

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2456

Description[?]:

The DSP feels that the military has no place in policing action.

The military is reserved for military duty.

If there is such an event that the police need help the regional guard, a force that is neither military or judicial, but is allowed to help with either, can be called upon to help.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:07:54, September 16, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Police Act of 2456
MessageWe will remind all parties that the mandatory vote explanation act is required for all bills excluding debate of other bills, and thus all parties excluding the bill creator must, by law explain there vote.

Date08:29:32, September 16, 2007 CET
From Chattes en Chaleur
ToDebating the Police Act of 2456
MessageVoting yes shouldnt have to explain. I thought we only voted that those voting no had to say something.

Date11:02:21, September 16, 2007 CET
FromPlato's Republican Party
ToDebating the Police Act of 2456
MessagePlato's Republicans played a crucial role in helping the nation to recognize the need for a reliable reserve of support to the civilian police force in the event of a serious emergency. We do not support this bill, as we feel it makes our nation less safe.

Date11:11:02, September 16, 2007 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Police Act of 2456
MessageWell it never really got spelled out, but everyone, excluding the bill author has to explain there vote, if you vote yes, just say you agree with the bill, if you vote no you have to explain why.
Of course if it's a bill that's just being put up to vote to clear out the debate area, you don't have to explain.
Of course if it's a really stupid bill, that its obvious why you're voting a certain way you don't have to explain why either.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 231

no
    

Total Seats: 368

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731

Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55