We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Act of 2456
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2456
Description[?]:
The DSP feels that the military has no place in policing action. The military is reserved for military duty. If there is such an event that the police need help the regional guard, a force that is neither military or judicial, but is allowed to help with either, can be called upon to help. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:07:54, September 16, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Police Act of 2456 |
Message | We will remind all parties that the mandatory vote explanation act is required for all bills excluding debate of other bills, and thus all parties excluding the bill creator must, by law explain there vote. |
Date | 08:29:32, September 16, 2007 CET | From | Chattes en Chaleur | To | Debating the Police Act of 2456 |
Message | Voting yes shouldnt have to explain. I thought we only voted that those voting no had to say something. |
Date | 11:02:21, September 16, 2007 CET | From | Plato's Republican Party | To | Debating the Police Act of 2456 |
Message | Plato's Republicans played a crucial role in helping the nation to recognize the need for a reliable reserve of support to the civilian police force in the event of a serious emergency. We do not support this bill, as we feel it makes our nation less safe. |
Date | 11:11:02, September 16, 2007 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Police Act of 2456 |
Message | Well it never really got spelled out, but everyone, excluding the bill author has to explain there vote, if you vote yes, just say you agree with the bill, if you vote no you have to explain why. Of course if it's a bill that's just being put up to vote to clear out the debate area, you don't have to explain. Of course if it's a really stupid bill, that its obvious why you're voting a certain way you don't have to explain why either. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 231 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 368 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam |