We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fair Imminent Domain Act of 2456
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2456
Description[?]:
The DSP feels that leaving imminent domain up to local governments is a bad idea as it means the local government could literally steal land without even paying for it and give that land to a corporation. Therefore the DSP proposes that imminent domain only be allowed for public works that will benefit the people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Current: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:42:28, September 16, 2007 CET | From | Plato's Republican Party | To | Debating the Fair Imminent Domain Act of 2456 |
Message | This bill expresses the PRP's views accurately, and we are happy to support it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 371 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 228 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening." - Ann Coulter |