Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:10:16
Server time: 13:49:43, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (8): AethanKal | dnobb | JJOXICO | JWDL | Kubrick2 | LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Zogu | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A bonding force for Malivia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2458

Description[?]:

With a free and open society we must define an institution which will keep us united and defined.

That force is Geraja.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:43:34, September 18, 2007 CET
FromRadical Labor Confederation
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageThe Red Panthers cannot support this bill after fighting a seperation of church and state for so long.

Date12:09:26, September 18, 2007 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageThe Militarist supports this bill. Malivia must have a cause to be unified under

Date12:10:28, September 18, 2007 CET
FromRadical Labor Confederation
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageWhy not freedom?

Date01:39:34, September 19, 2007 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageWe are willing to consider official religions for Malivia, but not Geraja alone, for that ignores the rest of our religious diversity.

Date01:56:06, September 19, 2007 CET
FromMilitarist Party
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageYes, unision under the ideals of freedom - suggested by one who has attempted to suppress that of the Malivian people for so long.

Date03:17:12, September 19, 2007 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the A bonding force for Malivia
MessageWe understand and respect diversity, however there must be a defining culture of Malivia. A heritage that helps define who we are and what we believe in. A backdrop which permits the population to understand and know what to expect from its government and the laws.

Many of the parties in the Parliament abhor the idea of racism, which is currently the path Malivia is pursuing to provide this binding force. We of the Protectorate Party feel that racism has no place in government. How can we instead promote a religious idealogy as a uniting force, you ask. We feel that this proposal has two major advantages over the current laws of the land. First and foremost , we do not require anyone to join the Geraja faith. The cultural of the religion instead provides holidays the country can celebrate together and a common historical and cultural understanding to share. Secondly the religion is an open one of understanding and many different sects where people can seek to find comfort. Geraja is a religion for the masses, and the individual. It promotes community and self improvement, it rejects fear and hatred.

We urge our fellow member to look at our nation and the forces that are pulling it apart, and realize that this bill will help strengthen Malivia and again unite us as a single culture.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 131

no
      

Total Seats: 425

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve 'the common good.' It is true that capitalism does, if that catch-phrase has any meaning, but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification for capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man's rational nature, that it protects man's survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is justice." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62