We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: environmental reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: CSA Communist Party of the DPRK
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2458
Description[?]:
ddd |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.
Current: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Proposed: All agricultural operations are state-owned and operated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for any research.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:13:51, September 18, 2007 CET | From | Communist Workers' Party | To | Debating the environmental reform |
Message | The Communist Workers' Party supports the measure to finalize the collectivization of our agriculture. However, we do not support the proposal to completely ban all forms of animal testing. Are we supposed to release new drugs directly to humans without seeing how animals react first? That sounds very dangerous. The Party supports animal rights but not at the expense of human rights. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 399 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 136 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 215 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |