We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence of our cities
Details
Submitted by[?]: Secular Humanist party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2459
Description[?]:
Given the recent, but short lived NRF successes, it is clear the local authorities do not see the importance of defendinf our cities. We think it's time that power was taken out of their hands, and a universal standard set for defensive provisions. These shelters will be nigh impenetrable steel vaults, with food and water, and generators to last many months. In the event of enemy attacks, our citixzens can retreat to them, and be safe while our soldiers deal with it. Even shouldte ciy fall, the shelters will allow our citizens to survive under siege for many months, long enough to retake the city with reinforcements. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 608 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 142 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." - Ronald Reagan |