We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Homosexuality in the military '59
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neoliberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2460
Description[?]:
| - |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Current: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:34:29, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Darnussian Social Democrat Party | To | Debating the Homosexuality in the military '59 |
| Message | Whislt we believe this is moving in the right direction the changes are not far reaching enough |
| Date | 16:47:35, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Homosexuality in the military '59 |
| Message | We agree entirely with the SDP. |
| Date | 17:16:36, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Homosexuality in the military '59 |
| Message | We respect homosexuality but it has no place in the military. |
| Date | 17:27:00, September 23, 2007 CET | From | Neoliberal Party | To | Debating the Homosexuality in the military '59 |
| Message | We think that the proposed law would be the best, gays wouldn't be hunted, but the moral of the military would still remain. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 133 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck |