Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 00:22:57
Server time: 15:37:02, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): Arusu-Gad | Arusu-Weareback | hexaus18 | Interstellar. | Lab47AU | SE33 | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: CP No Education in Prisons

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2460

Description[?]:

This only produces better educated criminals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:51:40, September 23, 2007 CET
FromDarnussian Social Democrat Party
ToDebating the CP No Education in Prisons
MessageIs this some sort of joke?

Date20:04:12, September 23, 2007 CET
FromNeoliberal Party
ToDebating the CP No Education in Prisons
MessageA bad joke... They've got majority..

Date21:04:15, September 23, 2007 CET
FromParty for the Republic
ToDebating the CP No Education in Prisons
MessageNo!

Date15:02:16, September 24, 2007 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the CP No Education in Prisons
MessageNo, it isn't a joke, thank God.

Date21:59:22, September 24, 2007 CET
FromAryan Kommunisten Partei
ToDebating the CP No Education in Prisons
MessageRubbish!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 150

no
     

Total Seats: 131

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66