We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Intervention Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2461
Description[?]:
We believe the military should be allowed to intervene with the civilian police however only in serious emergencies to avoid complications. The bill is open to discussion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:04:24, September 24, 2007 CET | From | United Labour Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Military Intervention Act |
Message | We agree with this bill. Military power should be kept under strict control to avoid any abuses. |
Date | 13:56:49, September 24, 2007 CET | From | Secular Humanist party | To | Debating the Military Intervention Act |
Message | We are fine with this. An attack by terrorists more than constitutes a serious emergency, which is all they would be needed for. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 439 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 311 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "I am a conservative to preserve all that is good in our constitution, a radical to remove all that is bad. I seek to preserve property and to respect order, and I equally decry the appeal to the passions of the many or the prejudices of the few." - Benjamin Disraeli |