We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Government Protects the People and Land
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2109
Description[?]:
All emissions of CO2 and smog-forming gases must be cut by 50% from their current level within ten years |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:24:31, August 18, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | What would be considered 'highly restrictive'? |
Date | 21:48:23, August 18, 2005 CET | From | Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | haha, ive been trying to consult with Green Action on that issue, but I haven't received a response |
Date | 14:40:38, August 23, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | Which of the two words in "highly restrictive" is the problem? Restrictive - limiting the possibilities of action to less than the naturaly ocurring number. Highly - adv - indicitang that the action is taken to close to the maximum limit. so Highly restrictive - removing nearly all possible actions. As we are a party that is founded on the principles of freedom of action and personal responsibility for those actions, is it suprising that we oppose this bill, whatever definition GA comes up with. |
Date | 05:21:48, August 25, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | Grammar is fun! Whee! |
Date | 17:11:52, August 29, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | ((by the way, our response was sent some time ago, and ASP you have omitted the word "not" from your post)) |
Date | 13:23:31, September 11, 2005 CET | From | Royal Conservative Party | To | Debating the The Government Protects the People and Land |
Message | I only stand for moderate restrictions so I am against |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 160 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 112 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno |