Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 02:43:36
Server time: 09:16:23, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Against Torture Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: Supreme Party of the Republic

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2461

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Against Torture Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:58:02, September 25, 2007 CET
FromSupreme Party of the Republic
ToDebating the Ratification of the Against Torture Treaty
MessageWe can not understand the TNP you voted against the alcohol because of the effects it has on the mind. But you are in favor of torture. So we can only assume that for the TNP mind damage is forbidden unless it is done by someone of the government in pursue of what might be called "national goals". Such totalitarian measures should not be endorsed by a party that think of democracy as society goal not and idea. We ask, with humility, to the TNP to rethink their priorities.

Date19:52:25, September 25, 2007 CET
FromTechnocratic Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Against Torture Treaty
MessageIt is apparent that we need to clarify our position on this issue. We would only allow such interrogation techniques to be used in the very worst situations where our national security is at risk. This is not something to be used on ordinary criminals. Why, exactly, should the government be concerned with the safety and well-being of someone who wishes to destroy us?

Besides, the sorts of individuals who would threaten our nation are already severely mentally damaged, and beyond any help.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 269

no
 

Total Seats: 130

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/

Random quote: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 43